On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 13:30 -0800, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:02:44PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 15:41 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Alistair Popple <alist...@popple.id.au>
> > > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:52:25 +1100
> > >
> > > > + out_be32(dev->reg, in_be32(dev->reg) | WKUP_ETH_RGMIIEN
> > > > + | WKUP_ETH_TX_OE | WKUP_ETH_RX_IE);
> > >
> > > When an expression spans multiple lines, the lines should end with
> > > operators rather than begin with them.
> >
> > That's not in CodingStyle currently.
>
> It's also not even remotely consistent across existing kernel code, and
> it isn't obvious that there's a general developer consensus on the
> "right" way to write it.
I agree with that. Stuff that's not in CodingStyle generally
doesn't have a developer consensus.
> > Right now, checkpatch emits a --strict only warning on "&&" or "||"
> > at the beginning of line but that could be changed to any "$Operators"
> >
> > our $Arithmetic = qr{\+|-|\*|\/|%};
> > our $Operators = qr{
> > <=|>=|==|!=|
> > =>|->|<<|>>|<|>|!|~|
> > &&|\|\||,|\^|\+\+|--|&|\||$Arithmetic
> > }x;
> >
> > The ones that likely have a too high false positive rates
> > are the negation "!" and bitwise "~".
>
> I don't think warning about operators at start of line seems like a good
> idea at all. There are plenty of cases where putting the operator at
> the start of the line will produce a better result. (I'd actually
> suggest that in *most* cases.)
>
> > Also, using perl, it's hard to distinguish between a
> > logical "&" and the address-of "&" as well as the
> > multiplication "*" and indirection "*" so maybe those
> > should be excluded too.
> >
> > And I think it should only be added as a --strict test.
>
> Agreed, if even that.
And probably made specific to net/ and drivers/net like
a few other comment style tests until such time as a
consensus exists.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
