Hi Christoph,
On 07.02.2014 [12:51:07 -0600], Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Here is a draft of a patch to make this work with memoryless nodes.
>
> The first thing is that we modify node_match to also match if we hit an
> empty node. In that case we simply take the current slab if its there.
>
> If there is no current slab then a regular allocation occurs with the
> memoryless node. The page allocator will fallback to a possible node and
> that will become the current slab. Next alloc from a memoryless node
> will then use that slab.
>
> For that we also add some tracking of allocations on nodes that were not
> satisfied using the empty_node[] array. A successful alloc on a node
> clears that flag.
>
> I would rather avoid the empty_node[] array since its global and there may
> be thread specific allocation restrictions but it would be expensive to do
> an allocation attempt via the page allocator to make sure that there is
> really no page available from the page allocator.
With this patch on our test system (I pulled out the numa_mem_id()
change, since you Acked Joonsoo's already), on top of 3.13.0 + my
kthread locality change + CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES + Joonsoo's RFC
patch 1):
MemTotal: 8264704 kB
MemFree: 5924608 kB
...
Slab: 1402496 kB
SReclaimable: 102848 kB
SUnreclaim: 1299648 kB
And Anton's slabusage reports:
slab mem objs slabs
used active active
------------------------------------------------------------
kmalloc-16384 207 MB 98.60% 100.00%
task_struct 134 MB 97.82% 100.00%
kmalloc-8192 117 MB 100.00% 100.00%
pgtable-2^12 111 MB 100.00% 100.00%
pgtable-2^10 104 MB 100.00% 100.00%
For comparison, Anton's patch applied at the same point in the series:
meminfo:
MemTotal: 8264704 kB
MemFree: 4150464 kB
...
Slab: 1590336 kB
SReclaimable: 208768 kB
SUnreclaim: 1381568 kB
slabusage:
slab mem objs slabs
used active active
------------------------------------------------------------
kmalloc-16384 227 MB 98.63% 100.00%
kmalloc-8192 130 MB 100.00% 100.00%
task_struct 129 MB 97.73% 100.00%
pgtable-2^12 112 MB 100.00% 100.00%
pgtable-2^10 106 MB 100.00% 100.00%
Consider this patch:
Acked-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <n...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <n...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I was thinking about your concerns about empty_node[]. Would it make
sense to use a helper function, rather than direct access to
direct_node, such as:
bool is_node_empty(int nid)
void set_node_empty(int nid, bool empty)
which we stub out if !HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES to return false and noop
respectively?
That way only architectures that have memoryless nodes pay the penalty
of the array allocation?
Thanks,
Nish
> Index: linux/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/slub.c 2014-02-03 13:19:22.896853227 -0600
> +++ linux/mm/slub.c 2014-02-07 12:44:49.311494806 -0600
> @@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ static inline bool kmem_cache_has_cpu_pa
> #endif
> }
>
> +static int empty_node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +
> /*
> * Issues still to be resolved:
> *
> @@ -1405,16 +1407,22 @@ static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem
> void *last;
> void *p;
> int order;
> + int alloc_node;
>
> BUG_ON(flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK);
>
> page = allocate_slab(s,
> flags & (GFP_RECLAIM_MASK | GFP_CONSTRAINT_MASK), node);
> - if (!page)
> + if (!page) {
> + if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + empty_node[node] = 1;
> goto out;
> + }
>
> order = compound_order(page);
> - inc_slabs_node(s, page_to_nid(page), page->objects);
> + alloc_node = page_to_nid(page);
> + empty_node[alloc_node] = 0;
> + inc_slabs_node(s, alloc_node, page->objects);
> memcg_bind_pages(s, order);
> page->slab_cache = s;
> __SetPageSlab(page);
> @@ -1712,7 +1720,7 @@ static void *get_partial(struct kmem_cac
> struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
> {
> void *object;
> - int searchnode = (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? numa_node_id() : node;
> + int searchnode = (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? numa_mem_id() : node;
>
> object = get_partial_node(s, get_node(s, searchnode), c, flags);
> if (object || node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
> @@ -2107,8 +2115,25 @@ static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache
> static inline int node_match(struct page *page, int node)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> - if (!page || (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && page_to_nid(page) != node))
> + int page_node;
> +
> + /* No data means no match */
> + if (!page)
> return 0;
> +
> + /* Node does not matter. Therefore anything is a match */
> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + return 1;
> +
> + /* Did we hit the requested node ? */
> + page_node = page_to_nid(page);
> + if (page_node == node)
> + return 1;
> +
> + /* If the node has available data then we can use it. Mismatch */
> + return !empty_node[page_node];
> +
> + /* Target node empty so just take anything */
> #endif
> return 1;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
