On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:09:23AM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > tree, tree, what's in a word. > > Something you may plant on a patch of grass? "Merging" becomes a > strange concept in that context though. :-)
I do know some farmers who splice trees thought :-) > > Its in my patch stack yes. > > Quilt I suppose?? (yet another word.) Yes, I'm one of the refugee Quilt users. Comes in handy when cold too :-) > > I should get some of that into tip I suppose, been side-tracked a bit > > this week. Sorry for the delay. > > If you prefer we pile those patches (and future ones after revew) > ourselves just let me know. Future patches are likely to be more > intimate with the scheduler so I just need to know who to upstream them > through afterwards. Normally I get Ingo to pick up the queue 1-2 times a week so latency shouldn't be too bad. But we just had the merge window and then I got side-tracked rewriting all atomic implementations. So usually submit patches against tip/master unless you know there's other pending bits that conflict, in which case you can grab my queue on top of tip/master -- but I try to make sure that's usually not needed. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
