On Friday, February 07, 2014 01:36:52 PM Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Some archs set the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag for idle states in which the
> local timers stop. The cpuidle_idle_call() currently handles such idle states
> by calling into the broadcast framework so as to wakeup CPUs at their next
> wakeup event. With the hrtimer mode of broadcast, the BROADCAST_ENTER call
> into the broadcast frameowork can fail for archs that do not have an external
> clock device to handle wakeups and the CPU in question has to thus be made
> the stand by CPU. This patch handles such cases by failing the call into
> cpuidle so that the arch can take some default action. The arch will certainly
> not enter a similar idle state because a failed cpuidle call will also 
> implicitly
> indicate that the broadcast framework has not registered this CPU to be woken 
> up.
> Hence we are safe if we fail the cpuidle call.
> 
> In the process move the functions that trace idle statistics just before and
> after the entry and exit into idle states respectively. In other
> scenarios where the call to cpuidle fails, we end up not tracing idle
> entry and exit since a decision on an idle state could not be taken. Similarly
> when the call to broadcast framework fails, we skip tracing idle statistics
> because we are in no further position to take a decision on an alternative
> idle state to enter into.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>

> ---
> 
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c |   14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index a55e68f..8beb0f02 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -140,12 +140,14 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>               return 0;
>       }
>  
> -     trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(next_state, dev->cpu);
> -
>       broadcast = !!(drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP);
>  
> -     if (broadcast)
> -             clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &dev->cpu);
> +     if (broadcast &&
> +             clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &dev->cpu))
> +             return -EBUSY;
> +
> +
> +     trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(next_state, dev->cpu);
>  
>       if (cpuidle_state_is_coupled(dev, drv, next_state))
>               entered_state = cpuidle_enter_state_coupled(dev, drv,
> @@ -153,11 +155,11 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>       else
>               entered_state = cpuidle_enter_state(dev, drv, next_state);
>  
> +     trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
> +
>       if (broadcast)
>               clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT, &dev->cpu);
>  
> -     trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
> -
>       /* give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome */
>       if (cpuidle_curr_governor->reflect)
>               cpuidle_curr_governor->reflect(dev, entered_state);
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to