On 01/31/2014 09:58 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Thu, 2014-16-01 at 23:53:49 UTC, Cody P Schafer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <c...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
index d8b600b..48d6efa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
@@ -269,11 +269,15 @@
#define H_COP 0x304
#define H_GET_MPP_X 0x314
#define H_SET_MODE 0x31C
-#define MAX_HCALL_OPCODE H_SET_MODE
+#define H_GET_24X7_CATALOG_PAGE 0xF078
+#define H_GET_24X7_DATA 0xF07C
+#define H_GET_PERF_COUNTER_INFO 0xF080
Ugh, why the hell did they put them up there.
+#define MAX_HCALL_OPCODE H_GET_PERF_COUNTER_INFO
We have an array which is sized based on this, which is unpleasant.
I think you're better off putting these below in the platform specific section,
and leaving MAX_HCALL_OPCODE alone. The only downside is you can't use the
hcall tracing to see them.
Ya, I'm aware. I've got them up there as I did want to trace them :) . I
don't see a big issue with moving them out of that section, though.
/* Platform specific hcalls, used by KVM */
#define H_RTAS 0xf000
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
