On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:22:55AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 01/27/2014 07:08 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing >> arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable(). >> >> We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and >> this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that case. And >> enabling FIQs has nothing to do with idling the CPU to start with. >> >> So let's introduce init_fiq_boot_cpu() to take care of FIQs on the boot >> CPU and remove arch_cpu_idle_prepare(). This is now done a bit earlier >> at late_initcall time but this shouldn't make a difference in practice >> i.e. when FIQs are actually used. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <n...@linaro.org> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
What kind of review did you do when giving that attributation? -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad. Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit". _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
