Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote on 01/08/2014 10:51:10 AM:
> From: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > To: Stephen N Chivers/AUS/CSC@CSC > Cc: <b...@kernel.crashing.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> > Date: 01/08/2014 10:51 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] powerpc/embedded6xx: Add support for > Motorola/Emerson MVME5100 > > On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 12:23 +1100, Stephen Chivers wrote: > > Add support for the Motorola/Emerson MVME5100 Single Board Computer. > > > > The MVME5100 is a 6U form factor VME64 computer with: > > > > - A single MPC7410 or MPC750 CPU > > - A HAWK Processor Host Bridge (CPU to PCI) and > > MultiProcessor Interrupt Controller (MPIC) > > - Up to 500Mb of onboard memory > > - A M48T37 Real Time Clock (RTC) and Non-Volatile Memory chip > > - Two 16550 compatible UARTS > > - Two Intel E100 Fast Ethernets > > - Two PCI Mezzanine Card (PMC) Slots > > - PPCBug Firmware > > > > The HAWK PHB/MPIC is compatible with the MPC10x devices. > > > > There is no onboard disk support. This is usually provided by > installing a PMC > > in first PMC slot. > > > > This patch revives the board support, it was present in early 2.6 > > series kernels. The board support in those days was by Matt Porter of > > MontaVista Software. > > > > CSC Australia has around 31 of these boards in service. The kernel in use > > for the boards is based on 2.6.31. The boards are operated without disks > > from a file server. > > > > This patch is based on linux-3.13-rc2 and has been boot tested. > > > > Only boards with 512 Mb of memory are known to work. > > > > V1->V2: > > Address comments by Kumar Gala and Scott Wood. > > Minor adjustment to platforms/embedded6xx/Kconfig to ensure > > correct indentation where possible. > > > > V2->V3: > > Address comments by Scott Wood and Ben Herrenschmidt. > > Address errors reported by checkpatch. > > > > V3->V4: > > Address comment by Geert Uytterhoeven > > Add tested by Alessio Bogani. > > > > V4->V5: > > Correct horrible typo in patch history. > > Kular Gama is Kumar Gala. > > The patch history should go below the --- line, as it's for reviewers > who have seen previous versions rather than for the git history. Ok. > > -Scott > > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
