On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:21:00PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
>We noticed a huge amount of slab memory consumed on a large ppc64 box:
>
>Slab: 2094336 kB
>
>Almost 2GB. This box is not balanced and some nodes do not have local
>memory, causing slub to be very inefficient in its slab usage.
>
>Each time we call kmem_cache_alloc_node slub checks the per cpu slab,
>sees it isn't node local, deactivates it and tries to allocate a new
>slab. On empty nodes we will allocate a new remote slab and use the
>first slot, but as explained above when we get called a second time
>we will just deactivate that slab and retry.
>
>As such we end up only using 1 entry in each slab:
>
>slab mem objects
> used active
>------------------------------------
>kmalloc-16384 1404 MB 4.90%
>task_struct 668 MB 2.90%
>kmalloc-128 193 MB 3.61%
>kmalloc-192 152 MB 5.23%
>kmalloc-8192 72 MB 23.40%
>kmalloc-16 64 MB 7.43%
>kmalloc-512 33 MB 22.41%
>
>The patch below checks that a node is not empty before deactivating a
>slab and trying to allocate it again. With this patch applied we now
>use about 352MB:
>
>Slab: 360192 kB
>
>And our efficiency is much better:
>
>slab mem objects
> used active
>------------------------------------
>kmalloc-16384 92 MB 74.27%
>task_struct 23 MB 83.46%
>idr_layer_cache 18 MB 100.00%
>pgtable-2^12 17 MB 100.00%
>kmalloc-65536 15 MB 100.00%
>inode_cache 14 MB 100.00%
>kmalloc-256 14 MB 97.81%
>kmalloc-8192 14 MB 85.71%
>
>Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <an...@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <liw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>---
>
>Thoughts? It seems like we could hit a similar situation if a machine
>is balanced but we run out of memory on a single node.
>
>Index: b/mm/slub.c
>===================================================================
>--- a/mm/slub.c
>+++ b/mm/slub.c
>@@ -2278,10 +2278,17 @@ redo:
>
> if (unlikely(!node_match(page, node))) {
> stat(s, ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH);
>- deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist);
>- c->page = NULL;
>- c->freelist = NULL;
>- goto new_slab;
>+
>+ /*
>+ * If the node contains no memory there is no point in trying
>+ * to allocate a new node local slab
>+ */
>+ if (node_spanned_pages(node)) {
s/node_spanned_pages/node_present_pages
>+ deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist);
>+ c->page = NULL;
>+ c->freelist = NULL;
>+ goto new_slab;
>+ }
> }
>
> /*
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>the body to majord...@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
>see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
