On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 10:18 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:47:54PM +1100, Michael Ellerman escreveu: > > On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 16:02 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > This patchset is the re-spin of the original branch stack > > > sampling > > > patchset which introduced new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND branch filter. This > > > patchset > > > also enables SW based branch filtering support for book3s powerpc > > > platforms which > > > have PMU HW backed branch stack sampling support. > > > > > > Summary of code changes in this patchset: > > > > > > (1) Introduces a new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND branch filter > > > (2) Add the "cond" branch filter options in the "perf record" tool > > > (3) Enable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND in X86 platforms > > > (4) Enable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND in POWER8 platform > > > (5) Update the documentation regarding "perf record" tool > > > > > > Hi Arnaldo, > > > > Can you please take just patches 1-5 into the perf tree? And do you mind > > putting them in a topic branch so Benh can merge that. > > This is mostly kernel code, I process the userspace ones, so I think either > Ingo or PeterZ should pick these, Ingo, Peter?
Urgh, sorry. MAINTAINERS just lists all of you in a block. Added PeterZ to CC. Peter/Ingo can you please take just patches 1-5 into the perf tree? And do you mind putting them in a topic branch so Benh can merge that. The generic & x86 changes have a Reviewed-by from Stephane, and the change to tools/perf has an ack-of-sorts from Arnaldo: > Only: > > Subject: [PATCH V4 03/10] perf, tool: Conditional branch filter 'cond' added > to perf record > > Which is a one liner, touches tools/perf/, and I'm ok with it. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
