Hello Scott,
On 11/12/2013 04:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:25 -0600, Lijun Pan wrote: >> mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig already have CONFIG_P1023RDS=y. >> Merge CONFIG_P1023RDB=y and other relevant configurations into >> mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85_defconfig. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <lijun....@freescale.com> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig | 188 >> ---------------------------- >> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig | 18 +++ >> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig | 17 +++ >> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig > > Are we still going to want to have one defconfig if and when we finally > get datapath support upstream? That's a lot of code to add to the 85xx > config just for this one chip. Yes. But for mpc85xx_/smp_defconfig the datapath support shouldn't be enabled by default given that just one SoC in that family has the datapath (and we don't plan to put it in another e500v2 based SoC). For regression/automation purposes config fragments should be used Cheers, _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
