Hi Scott, > -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 5:27 AM > To: Xie Xiaobo-R63061 > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Johnston Michael- > R49610 > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] powerpc/85xx: Add TWR-P1025 board support > > > > > > > + /* CS2 for Display */ > > > > > > + ssd1289@2,0 { > > > > > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > > > > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > > > > > + compatible = "ssd1289"; > > > > > > + reg = <0x2 0x0000 0x0002 > > > > > > + 0x2 0x0002 0x0002>; > > > > > > + }; > > > > > > > > > > Node names should be generic. What does ssd1289 do? If this is > > > > > actually the display device, then it should be called > "display@2,0". > > > > > > > > OK. The ssd1289 is a LCD controller. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about a vendor prefix on that compatible? Why > > > > > #address-cells/#size- cells despite no child nodes? Where is a > > > > > binding that says what each of those two reg resources mean? > > > > > > > > I will add the vendor prefix. I review the ssd1289 driver, and the > > > #address-cells/#size-cells were un-used. I will remove them. > > > > > > And a binding? > > > > > > Why do you need two separate reg resources rather than just <2 0 4>? > > > Will they ever be discontiguous? > > > > [Xie] I review the ssd1289 driver code, and found the driver need two > > reg resources, > > The device tree describes the hardware, not the current state of Linux > drivers. Especially drivers that aren't yet in Linux. :-) >
OK, I will remain the display node. > > if change the dts, the driver also should be modified accordingly. So > > I remove the ssd1289 node from this patch. I will submit new patch > > include the dts modification, ssd1289 driver and the binding. > > Ideally all devices (and bindings) should be described when the device > tree is initally added, regardless of whether you have a driver yet. > I will add a binding document for the ssd1289 device. > -Scott > - Xiaobo _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev