> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Emulate "lwsync" to run standard user land on e500
> cores
>
>
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 00:07 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Oct 18, 2013, at 2:38 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> >>> index f783c93..f330374 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> >>> @@ -986,6 +986,13 @@ static int emulate_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> + /* Emulating the lwsync insn as a sync insn */
> >>> + if (instword == PPC_INST_LWSYNC) {
> >>> + PPC_WARN_EMULATED(lwsync, regs);
> >>> + asm volatile("sync" : : : "memory");
...
> I'm not sure I'm a fan of doing this as it silently hides a significant
> performance impact.
>
> Could we possible re-write the userspace instruction to be a 'sync' when we
> hit this?
You'd need to modify the memory without marking the page dirty.
(Which might be interesting for other cpu-dependant optimisations.)
David
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
