> > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c b/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c
> > index 1f4093f..4e2e4c9 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c
> > @@ -883,14 +883,19 @@ static int ldo_regulator_register(struct
> snd_soc_codec *codec,
> > struct regulator_init_data *init_data,
> > int voltage)
> > {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SND_SOC_FSL_SGTL5000
> > + return 0;
> > +#else
> > dev_err(codec->dev, "this setup needs regulator support in the
> kernel\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > +#endif
> >
> This looks wrong to me, as this will disable the error for unsolicited
> platforms in a multi arch kernel!
>
The CONFIG_SND_SOC_FSL_SGTL5000 micro will be renamed to
CONFIG_SND_SOC_FSL_SGTL5000_VF610.
In VF610, there has not Power Manager Module, so whether the CONFIG_REGULATOR
is enable or
Disabled, there will always some errors booting...
> > static int ldo_regulator_remove(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) {
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +
> > #endif
> >
> Why do you add an extra empty line here?
>
This will be remove later.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
