On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 12:59 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> @@ -376,6 +405,7 @@ static int fsl_of_msi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>       int len;
>       u32 offset;
>       static const u32 all_avail[] = { 0, NR_MSI_IRQS };
> +     static int bank_index;
>  
>       match = of_match_device(fsl_of_msi_ids, &dev->dev);
>       if (!match)
> @@ -419,8 +449,8 @@ static int fsl_of_msi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>                               dev->dev.of_node->full_name);
>                       goto error_out;
>               }
> -             msi->msiir_offset =
> -                     features->msiir_offset + (res.start & 0xfffff);
> +             msi->msiir = res.start + features->msiir_offset;
> +             printk("msi->msiir = %llx\n", msi->msiir);

dev_dbg or remove

>       }
>  
>       msi->feature = features->fsl_pic_ip;
> @@ -470,6 +500,7 @@ static int fsl_of_msi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     msi->bank_index = bank_index++;

What if multiple MSIs are boing probed in parallel?  bank_index is not
atomic.

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h
> index 8225f86..6bd5cfc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h
> @@ -29,12 +29,19 @@ struct fsl_msi {
>       struct irq_domain *irqhost;
>  
>       unsigned long cascade_irq;
> -
> -     u32 msiir_offset; /* Offset of MSIIR, relative to start of CCSR */
> +     dma_addr_t msiir; /* MSIIR Address in CCSR */

Are you sure dma_addr_t is right here, versus phys_addr_t?  It implies
that it's the output of the DMA API, but I don't think the DMA API is
used in the MSI driver.  Perhaps it should be, but we still want the raw
physical address to pass on to VFIO.

>       void __iomem *msi_regs;
>       u32 feature;
>       int msi_virqs[NR_MSI_REG];
>  
> +     /*
> +      * During probe each bank is assigned a index number.
> +      * index number ranges from 0 to 2^32.
> +      * Example  MSI bank 1 = 0
> +      * MSI bank 2 = 1, and so on.
> +      */
> +     int bank_index;

2^32 doesn't fit in "int" (nor does 2^32 - 1).

Just say that indices start at 0.

-Scott



_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to