Michael Ellerman [mich...@ellerman.id.au] wrote:
| bool is_load_store(int ext_opcode)
| {
| upper = ext_opcode >> 5;
| lower = ext_opcode & 0x1f;
|
| /* Short circuit as many misses as we can */
| if (lower < 3 || lower > 23)
| return false;
I see some loads/stores like these which are not covered by
the above check. Is it ok to ignore them ?
lower == 29: ldepx, stdepx, eviddepx, evstddepx
lower == 31: lwepx, lbepx, lfdepx, stfdepx,
Looking through the opcode maps, I also see these for primary
op code 4:
evldd, evlddx, evldwx, evldw, evldh, evldhx.
Should we include those also ?
Sukadev
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
