On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 14:54 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > <b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be better to simply have pci_enable_device() always set bus > > master on a bridge? I don't see any case where it makes sense to have > > an enabled bridge without the master bit set on it... > > Do you mean attached?
So this patch works and fixes the problem. I think it makes the whole thing more robust and should be applied. I still don't know why the bridge doesn't get enabled properly without it yes, tracking it down (the machine in question takes a LONG time to reboot :-) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
