On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 21:11 -0500, Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579 wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 2:49 AM > > To: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579 > > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > > ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Aggrwal Poonam-B10812; Jain Priyanka-B32167; > > Sethi Varun-B16395 > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc85xx:Add initial device tree support of > > T104x > > > > On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 02:30 -0500, Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579 wrote: > > > > I also question the need to define separate t1040 compatible values > > > > for all of these, if the only difference is whether the onboard > > > > switch is enabled or not. > > > > > > > > > > so should I use T104x as compatible field. and in T1040 device tree add > > extra node for l2 switch. > > I am using T1042 as base dts and T1040 includes T1040 + l2switch. > > so if I use T1042 in compatible. It will give wrong field for someone working > on T1040QDS.
What is wrong about it? It is compatible, right? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
