On 18/09/13 15:51, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha > <sudeep.karkadanage...@arm.com> wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanage...@arm.com> >> >> Hi, >> >> The cache bindings are generic and used by many other architectures >> apart from PPC. These patches fixes and move the existing definition >> of of_find_next_cache_node to DT common code. >> >> Regards, >> Sudeep > > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> > > However, do you have a user for this function on other architectures > yet? I'd like to see a user for the function in the same patch series.. >
Yes I have posted an RFC[1] following this series implementing cacheinfo for ARM similar to x86 implementation. I was not sure if it's good idea to combine it as its still initial RFC version. Regards, Sudeep [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
