On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 02:35 -0500, Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579 wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 5:11 AM
> > To: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Jain
> > Priyanka-B32167; Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/fsl-booke: Add initial T104x_QDS board
> > support
> >
> > On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:28 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> > > + aliases {
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > + };
> >
> > TODO? Did you mean this patch as an RFC?
> >
>
>
> actually, this patch is not adding in dpaa related node(fman,bman etc).
> I am keeping place holder for alias of Ethernet nodes.
If you don't have any board-level aliases yet, then just don't include
the aliases node in this file.
> > Also, whitespace.
> >
>
> does whitespace is not captured in checkpatch?
Not in dts files.
> > Maybe some of this stuff could be put in a common dtsi between t1040 and
> > t1042?
> >
> > Ideally for t1042 you'd just take the entire t1040 tree as an include,
> > and add the switch
> >
>
> means, I just create T1042qds.dts and for T1040.dts include t1042dts + switch
Is it t1040 that has the switch or t1042?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
