On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 16:12 +0800, Zhang Haijun wrote:
> On 09/02/2013 06:37 PM, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> > We use property "sdhci,auto-cmd12" instead of "fsl,sdhci-auto-cmd12"
> > to distinguish if the sdhc host has quirk
> > SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ_ACMD12.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang <haijun.zh...@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
> > b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
> > index 5180d9d..0c0efa9 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
> > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ usb@22000 {
> >
> > /include/ "pq3-esdhc-0.dtsi"
> > sdhc@2e000 {
> > - fsl,sdhci-auto-cmd12;
> > + sdhci,auto-cmd12;
> > interrupts = <41 0x2 0 0>;
> > };
> >
> >
>
>
> Hi, scott
>
> Could you help review this patch?
I process patches in periodic batches. There's no need for a reminder
when it's only been two weeks, as long as it's still marked "new" or
"under review" in patchwork (and you should include a patchwork link in
any such reminder e-mail). Especially for a trivial patch such as this,
no comment often means I looked at it and saw no problems and will take
it in the next batch.
Though if you want a comment, don't capitalize "powerpc" in the
subject. :-)
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
