Le 12/09/2013 02:15, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit :
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 17:36 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
I wonder why we don't start from entry 31 so we can actually make use of
that autodecrement. What will happen when we load the first normal TLB
entry later on? I don't see any setting of SPRN_MD_CTR after this code,
so won't it overwrite entry 30 (the middle 8M) in the CONFIG_PIN_TLB
case?
Ben, would patches like this be considered bugfixes as far as merging
goes, or would they be for next given that it's something that's never
really worked right and hasn't been touched in years?
Since they don't affect anything outside of 8xx, I'm happy to take them
until around -rc2 or 3. But it's your call really.
Scott, you're right, I didn't see that other consequence.
I'll come with a more complete patch this afternoon.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
