On 08/22/2013 11:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:20 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>> But if having cpuidle backend-driver separately for other powerpc arcs
>> makes sense such that each one have their own state information etc
>> then it makes sense to name the files as cpuidle-power.c,
>> cpuilde-ppc32.c and so on.
> 
> If by "power" you mean IBM POWER machines/CPUs, then make it
> cpuidle-ibm-power or cpuidle-book3s64 maybe to clarify what families it
> affects.

Sure. Thanks :)

Regards,
Deepthi


> Cheers
> Ben.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to