Hey Stephen, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:22:46AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:28:44 -0500 Ben Myers <b...@sgi.com> wrote: > > I'd prefer not to break Stephen's tree two days in a row. We could just > > revert > > d6970d4b726c in the xfs tree for the time being as Stephen has done, but > > given > > the choice would prefer the fix. Do you have a preference between the two > > approaches that Dwight has posted? The first seems more conservative... > > I will automatically revert that commit when I merge the xfs tree until > some other solution is forthcoming (so you don't have to do the revert in > the xfs tree).
Gah. That makes sense. ;) > This does need to be fixed fairly soon, though. Agreed, thanks. -Ben _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
