On 08/07/2013 05:11 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 09:30 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 18:08 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: >>> Here's another example. get_lppaca() will only build on book3s -- and >>> yet we get requests for e500 code to use this file. >> >> Indeed, Besides there is already accessors afaik for lppaca that compile >> to nothing on E (and if not they would be trivial to add). > > I don't see such an accessor, but if there were, what would happen when > the caller goes on to dereference that nothing? > > There is an accessor for shared_proc specifically (in the spinlock code) > -- not that it would be much help on booke to just compile away that > check and always select one of the pseries state tables over the other. > > -Scott
Thanks a lot Scott and Ben for the review. I have addressed the issues in V3 of this patch series which I have just posted out. Regards, Deepthi > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
