On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Leon Ravich <lrav...@gmail.com> wrote: > From comparison of pci printout from the two kernel , > beside the EDAC errors I noticed other strange differences: > > In 3.8.13 I got BAR 7 and BAR 8: > [ 39.017749] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0xc0000000-0xdfffffff] > [ 39.024530] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 7: can't assign io (size 0x10000) > > In 3.8.13 I am getting: > [ 38.931873] pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: can not insert [bus 01-ff] > under [bus 00-01] (conflicts with (null) [bus 00-01]) > > > On 6 August 2013 09:32, Leon Ravich <lrav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks Bjorn.
Is this still a problem, or have you found a solution in the meantime? >> 1) If I understand it right this patch only removes the "pci >> 0000:00:00.0: ignoring class 0x0b2000 (doesn't >> match header type 01)" message , don't care about it , had it before . It also affects how the PCI core handles the device. But as you said, if you had the message before, it's probably not the cause of the current problem. >> 2) regarding the comparing of printouts: Can you post the complete logs somewhere, maybe in a bugzilla or similar? Where are the "PCIE ERR_CAP_STAT" and similar messages from? My quick grep didn't find them. Bjorn _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
