Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> writes: > Can you add some more printk's in there to check what's going on inside > wf_fcu_get_pump_minmax() ?
All values from mpu->processor_part_num are 0xffff. > Also is it getting faults for both pumps ? Yes. > Does it work with the older driver ? (both the minmax and the reading of > the pump). The minmax situation is the same, but otherwise appears to work (no fan reading errors logged). Here is an example debug output: ** CPU 1 RPM: 300 Ex, 300, Pump: 1250, In, overtemp: 0 cpu 0, exhaust RPM: 300 cpu 0, temp raw: 023c, m_diode: 9982, b_diode: fffff799 temp: 52.139 cpu 0, current: 8.789, voltage: 1.286, power: 11.308 W cpu 1, exhaust RPM: 300 cpu 1, temp raw: 021c, m_diode: a047, b_diode: fffff777 temp: 50.380 cpu 1, current: 8.666, voltage: 1.281, power: 11.108 W power target: 55.000, error: 43.691 integral: 00f42f8d integ_p: 10 adj_in_target: 65.011, ttarget: 74 deriv_p: -15 prop_p: -103 sum: -118 > What is the "failures" bitmask value ? 3 for both. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
