On 07/30/2013 09:13:28 PM, Liu Po-B43644 wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 2:28 AM
> To: Liu Po-B43644
> Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Fleming
Andy-
> AFLEMING; Hu Mingkai-B21284; Liu Po-B43644
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/85xx: Add silicon device tree
for
> C293
>
> On 07/30/2013 03:49:22 AM, Po Liu wrote:
> > + crypto@80000 {
> > +/include/ "qoriq-sec6.0-0.dtsi"
> > + };
> > +
> > + crypto@80000 {
> > + reg = <0x80000 0x20000>;
> > + ranges = <0x0 0x80000 0x20000>;
> > +
> > + jr@1000{
> > + interrupts = <45 2 0 0>;
> > + };
> > + jr@2000{
> > + interrupts = <57 2 0 0>;
> > + };
> > + };
>
> Do these inline the way the example shows.
Sorry, Scott, I just remember in this way, the node can't be
recognized by system when run Uboot. The include can't be in the
crypto@80000. See the discussion in
http://git.am.freescale.net:8181/#/c/736/ .
Maybe I should re-modify the example file.
git.am.freescale.net is not accessible outside of Freescale; don't
reference it on external lists. In any case, I don't know what
specifically you want me to look at there. Just put the explanation
here.
I do not expect the dtc output to be any different between the two
methods. Could you check this (by using dtc to decompile the dtb
afterward) and point out exactly how the output differs between the two
approaches?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
