On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:19:13AM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > Sorry I'm a bit late to the thread, I've ben swamped. Has someone > > tested this with kexec/kdump? Thats why the origional patch was > > created, because when kexec loads the kernel at a different physical > > address, the relocations messed with the module crc's, and modules > > couldn't load during the kexec boot. Assuming that kernaddr_start > > gets set appropriately during boot, using PHYSICAL_START should be > > fine, but I wanted to check, and don't currently have access to a > > powerpc system to do so. Neil > > I tested a relocatable kernel forced to run at a non zero physical > address (ie basically kdump). I verified CRCs were bad with your > original patch backed out, and were good with this patch applied. > > Anton >
Perfect, sounds like a sufficient test to me. Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
