On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:34:26 -0500, Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/01/2013 01:20 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > On some PAE architectures, the entire range of physical memory could reside > > outside the 32-bit limit. These systems need the ability to specify the > > initrd location using 64-bit numbers. > > > > This patch globally modifies the early_init_dt_setup_initrd_arch() function > > to > > use 64-bit numbers instead of the current unsigned long. > > > > There has been quite a bit of debate about whether to use u64 or > > phys_addr_t. > > It was concluded to stick to u64 to be consistent with rest of the device > > tree code. As summarized by Geert, "The address to load the initrd is > > decided > > by the bootloader/user and set at that point later in time. The dtb should > > not > > be tied to the kernel you are booting" > > That was quoting me. Otherwise: > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herr...@calxeda.com> > > Unless Grant feels compelled to pick this up for 3.11, I think it has to > wait for 3.12.
Nope, 3.12 is fine. Applied. g. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
