On 07/15/2013 08:35:07 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 5, 2013, at 1:27 AM, <hongbo.zh...@freescale.com> <hongbo.zh...@freescale.com> wrote:> +dma0: dma@100300 { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + compatible = "fsl,elo3-dma"; why does this require a new compatible?
The binding has changed -- there is now a second reg entry. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
