On 07/09/2013 03:35:43 AM, Haijun Zhang wrote:
Overview of P1020RDB-PD device:
- DDR3 2GB
- NOR flash 64MB
- NAND flash 128MB
- SPI flash 16MB
- I2C EEPROM 256Kb
- eTSEC1 (RGMII PHY) connected to VSC7385 L2 switch
- eTSEC2 (SGMII PHY)
- eTSEC3 (RGMII PHY)
- SDHC
- 2 USB ports
- 4 TDM ports
- PCIe

Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang <haijun.zh...@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang <chang-ming.hu...@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie Xiaobo-R63061 <x....@freescale.com>
CC: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com>
---
changes for v3:
        - Remove some blank and changed the usb node
        - Renamed the dts file
        - change the cpld name of pd board

 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1020rdb-pd.dts  |  90 ++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1020rdb-pd.dtsi | 257 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 347 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1020rdb-pd.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1020rdb-pd.dtsi

Again, why do you need a separate .dtsi? If this isn't for a 32/36-bit split, what is the criteria for what goes in the .dts versus what goes in the .dtsi?

+               partition@600000 {
+                       /* 4MB for Compressed Root file System Image */
+                       reg = <0x00600000 0x00400000>;
+                       label = "NAND Compressed RFS Image";
+               };
+
+               partition@a00000 {
+                       /* 22MB for JFFS2 based Root file System */
+                       reg = <0x00a00000 0x01600000>;
+                       label = "NAND JFFS2 Root File System";
+               };

Don't refer to JFFS2. It's bad enough that we specify partition layout here -- no need to specify the filesystem type, especially when it's a fs type that is no longer recommended.

+               partition@2000000 {
+                       /* 96MB for RAMDISK based Root file System */
+                       reg = <0x02000000 0x06000000>;
+                       label = "NAND Writable User area";
+               };

Wouldn't it be better to combine these last three partitions? Why do you need three root filesystems?

+       cpld@2,0 {
+               compatible = "fsl,p1020rdb-pd-cpld";
+               reg = <0x2 0x0 0x20000>;
+               read-only;
+       };

Remove read-only.

+       spi@7000 {
+               flash@0 {
+                       #address-cells = <1>;
+                       #size-cells = <1>;
+                       compatible = "spansion,s25sl12801";
+                       reg = <0>;
+ spi-max-frequency = <40000000>; /* input clock */
+
+                       partition@u-boot {
+                               /* 512KB for u-boot Bootloader Image */
+                               reg = <0x0 0x00080000>;
+                               label = "u-boot";
+                               read-only;
+                       };
+
+                       partition@dtb {
+                               /* 512KB for DTB Image*/
+                               reg = <0x00080000 0x00080000>;
+                               label = "dtb";
+                       };
+
+                       partition@kernel {
+                               /* 4MB for Linux Kernel Image */
+                               reg = <0x00100000 0x00400000>;
+                               label = "kernel";
+                       };

These unit addresses are not appropriate. They should match reg, not label.

+                       partition@fs {
+                               /* 4MB for Compressed RFS Image */
+                               reg = <0x00500000 0x00400000>;
+                               label = "file system";
+                       };
+
+                       partition@jffs-fs {
+                               /* 7MB for JFFS2 based RFS */
+                               reg = <0x00900000 0x00700000>;
+                               label = "file system jffs2";
+                       };

As with NAND flash, please combine these and don't reference JFFS2.

+               };
+
+               slic@0 {
+                       compatible = "zarlink,le88266";
+                       reg = <1>;
+                       spi-max-frequency = <8000000>;
+               };
+
+               slic@1 {
+                       compatible = "zarlink,le88266";
+                       reg = <2>;
+                       spi-max-frequency = <8000000>;
+               };
+       };
+
+       mdio@24000 {
+               phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
+                       interrupts = <3 1 0 0>;
+                       reg = <0x0>;
+               };
+               phy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
+                       interrupts = <2 1 0 0>;
+                       reg = <0x1>;
+               };
+       };

Again, leave a blank line between nodes. If I comment about a style issue in one place, you should also fix the same issue in other places where it occurs.

+       /*
+        * USB2 is shared with localbus, so it must be disabled
+        * by default. We can't put 'status = "disabled";' here
+        * since U-Boot doesn't clear the status property when
+        * it enables USB2. OTOH, U-Boot does create a new node
+        * when there isn't any. So, just comment it out.
+        * usb@23000 {
+        *      status = "disabled";
+        *      phy_type = "ulpi";
+        * };
+        */

No. Fix U-Boot to do whatever updating it needs to do based on runtime configuration. Do not add commented out nodes to the tree.

-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to