On 06/06/2013 09:00:20 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
As you can see, the only difference between these two logs is the
io resource address and all the mem and bus address are still the
same.
Hmm... The thing that originally motivated the picking of an arbitrary
primary was virtio being assigned a BAR of zero, and QEMU not liking
that. I guess something changed so that's no longer happening, even
without a primary.
> Is anything actually fixed by this?
No. As you know the reason we need a primary bus is that we need to
support
some ISA legacy devices. So it seems a little weird that we have to
pick
one primary bus even on a board which doesn't has ISA at all.
Yeah, it was a workaround for some other issues, as discussed. It was
meant to be temporary.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
