From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/gup.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/gup.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/gup.c
index 4b921af..3d36fd7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/gup.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/gup.c
@@ -66,9 +66,20 @@ static int gup_pmd_range(pud_t pud, unsigned long addr, 
unsigned long end,
                pmd_t pmd = *pmdp;
 
                next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
-               if (pmd_none(pmd))
+               /*
+                * The pmd_trans_splitting() check below explains why
+                * pmdp_splitting_flush has to flush the tlb, to stop
+                * this gup-fast code from running while we set the
+                * splitting bit in the pmd. Returning zero will take
+                * the slow path that will call wait_split_huge_page()
+                * if the pmd is still in splitting state. gup-fast
+                * can't because it has irq disabled and
+                * wait_split_huge_page() would never return as the
+                * tlb flush IPI wouldn't run.
+                */
+               if (pmd_none(pmd) || pmd_trans_splitting(pmd))
                        return 0;
-               if (pmd_huge(pmd)) {
+               if (pmd_huge(pmd) || pmd_large(pmd)) {
                        if (!gup_hugepte((pte_t *)pmdp, PMD_SIZE, addr, next,
                                         write, pages, nr))
                                return 0;
-- 
1.8.1.2

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to