On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 14:35 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > + seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "PMS"); > > Lets make this PMIS or PMI_S instead of PMS.
Everything else is aligned using a three character prefix, so that would stuff the alignment up. > > > + for_each_online_cpu(j) > > + seq_printf(p, "%10u ", per_cpu(irq_stat, j).pmu_irqs); > > This would be pmu_spurious_irqs instead of pmu_irqs. Yep, thanks for reviewing. I'm actually thinking I'll drop the counter, at least until we can be sure it's not us causing the spurious interrupts. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
