On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > Why are you not keen on this? It seems like normal device driver > > > practice, that is what the data field of of_device_id is typically > > > used for.. > > > > I'm not keen on it because we don't have a document saying "All kirkwood > > SoCs need PSC1 set to X after reset." We know it, but have we tested > > the 6282? > > 6282 looses its MAC address, that much i know. I've no idea about > PSC1, but if its MAC address behaviour is the same as 6281, is expect > PSC1 is the same.
Do you have a board set up for testing you could try Sebastian's forthcoming series on (with "marvell,kirkwood-eth")? thx, Jason. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
