On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:54:04PM -0500, Brian King wrote:
> 
> Recent commit e61133dda480062d221f09e4fc18f66763f8ecd0 added support
> for a new firmware feature to force an adapter to use 32 bit MSIs.
> However, this firmware is not available for all systems. The hack below
> allows devices needing 32 bit MSIs to work on these systems as well.
> It is careful to only enable this on Gen2 slots, which should limit
> this to configurations where this hack is needed and tested to work.

Sorry I know you've already sent this to me once, but I didn't get time
to reply.

> diff -puN arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c~powerpc_32bit_msi_hack_on_papr 
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> --- linux/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c~powerpc_32bit_msi_hack_on_papr 
> 2013-05-15 10:44:46.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-bjking1/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c        2013-05-20 
> 15:24:52.000000000 -0500
> @@ -397,10 +397,11 @@ static int check_msix_entries(struct pci
>  static int rtas_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nvec_in, int type)
>  {
>       struct pci_dn *pdn;
> -     int hwirq, virq, i, rc;
> +     int hwirq, virq, i, rc = -1;

I'd rather you didn't do a catch-all initialisation like this, it's too
easy to miss a return path.

>       struct msi_desc *entry;
>       struct msi_msg msg;
>       int nvec = nvec_in;
> +     int use_32bit_msi_hack = 0;
>  
>       pdn = get_pdn(pdev);
>       if (!pdn)
> @@ -428,15 +429,37 @@ static int rtas_setup_msi_irqs(struct pc
>        */
>  again:
>       if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI) {
> -             if (pdn->force_32bit_msi)
> +             if (pdn->force_32bit_msi) {
>                       rc = rtas_change_msi(pdn, RTAS_CHANGE_32MSI_FN, nvec);
> -             else
> +                     if (rc < 0) {
> +                             /* We only want to run the 32 bit MSI hack 
> below if
> +                              the max bus speed is Gen2 speed. */
> +                             if (pdev->bus->max_bus_speed != 
> PCIE_SPEED_5_0GT)
> +                                     return rc;
> +
> +                             use_32bit_msi_hack = 1;
> +                     }
> +             }
> +
> +             if (rc < 0)
>                       rc = rtas_change_msi(pdn, RTAS_CHANGE_MSI_FN, nvec);
>  
> -             if (rc < 0 && !pdn->force_32bit_msi) {
> +             if (rc < 0) {
>                       pr_debug("rtas_msi: trying the old firmware call.\n");
>                       rc = rtas_change_msi(pdn, RTAS_CHANGE_FN, nvec);
>               }
> +
> +             if (use_32bit_msi_hack && rc > 0) {
> +                     int pos;
> +                     u32 addr_hi, addr_lo;
> +
> +                     dev_info(&pdev->dev, "rtas_msi: No 32 bit MSI firmware 
> support, forcing 32 bit MSI\n");
> +                     pos = pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
> +                     pci_read_config_dword(pdev, pos + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_HI, 
> &addr_hi);
> +                     addr_lo = 0xffff0000 | ((addr_hi >> (48 - 32)) << 4);
> +                     pci_write_config_dword(pdev, pos + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_LO, 
> addr_lo);
> +                     pci_write_config_dword(pdev, pos + PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_HI, 
> 0);

This is basically baking knowledge of phyp's address layout into the
kernel right? Which is OK, but it needs a big fat comment describing
exactly what it's doing and why it's safe.

cheers
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to