On 08.05.2013 [06:49:38 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 13:33 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > Similarily, Nish, you may need to check that we remove those bits if > > > pHyp has the partition in a mode that doesn't support them (P7 > > > compatibility for example) for migration purposes. > > > > Yep, I'll need to talk with Mikey about this part. Will be a follow-on > > patch if needed. Minimally, the bit defines will stay the same, which is > > the important part to get going right now. > > Actually in such a mode we'd get a back-version architected PVR so we > should be fine now that I think twice, but of course that need to be > tested.
True, I'll make sure it does get tested. -Nish _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
