On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:29:54PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Murray <andrew.mur...@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:44:01PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:18:27 +0100, Andrew Murray <andrew.mur...@arm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > /* Act based on address space type */
> >> > res = NULL;
> >> > - switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
> >> > - case 1: /* PCI IO space */
> >> > + res_type = range.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS;
> >> > + if (res_type == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> >>
> >> Why the change from switch() to an if/else if sequence?
> >
> > Russell King suggested this change - see
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2323941/
>
> Umm, that isn't what that link shows. That link shows the patch
> already changing to an if/else if construct, and rmk is commenting on
> that.
Arh yes sorry about that. I can't find or remember any good reason why I
changed it from a switch to an if/else :\
Andrew Murray
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
