On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 16:32 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:16:57AM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> > It seems that rflags don't get changed in  the repeating loop, so move
> > it out of the loop.

> You've also changed the way new_pte is handled on repeat, but I think
> that's OK too.

OK, I'll add it in the description :)

Thanks, Zhong

> cheers
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c 
> > b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c
> > index cecad34..edb4129 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c
> > @@ -87,10 +87,6 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long 
> > access, unsigned long vsid,
> >  
> >             pa = pte_pfn(__pte(old_pte)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> >  
> > -repeat:
> > -           hpte_group = ((hash & htab_hash_mask) *
> > -                         HPTES_PER_GROUP) & ~0x7UL;
> > -
> >             /* clear HPTE slot informations in new PTE */
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> >             new_pte = (new_pte & ~_PAGE_HPTEFLAGS) | _PAGE_HPTE_SUB0;
> 
> ie. here new_pte was updated on repeat, but now it's not.
> 
> > @@ -101,6 +97,10 @@ repeat:
> >             rflags |= (new_pte & (_PAGE_WRITETHRU | _PAGE_NO_CACHE |
> >                                   _PAGE_COHERENT | _PAGE_GUARDED));
> >  
> > +repeat:
> > +           hpte_group = ((hash & htab_hash_mask) *
> > +                         HPTES_PER_GROUP) & ~0x7UL;
> > +
> >             /* Insert into the hash table, primary slot */
> >             slot = ppc_md.hpte_insert(hpte_group, vpn, pa, rflags, 0,
> >                                       mmu_psize, ssize);
> 


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to