On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 10:19 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/02/13 09:16, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 22:54 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> @@ -707,11 +709,39 @@ struct iommu_table *iommu_init_table(struct
> >> iommu_table *tbl, int nid)
> >> return tbl;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void group_release(void *iommu_data)
> >> +{
> >> + struct iommu_table *tbl = iommu_data;
> >> + tbl->it_group = NULL;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +void iommu_register_group(struct iommu_table * tbl,
> >> + int domain_number, unsigned long pe_num)
> >> +{
> >> + struct iommu_group *grp;
> >> +
> >> + grp = iommu_group_alloc();
> >> + if (IS_ERR(grp)) {
> >> + pr_info("powerpc iommu api: cannot create new group, err=%ld\n",
> >> + PTR_ERR(grp));
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >> + tbl->it_group = grp;
> >> + iommu_group_set_iommudata(grp, tbl, group_release);
> >> + iommu_group_set_name(grp, kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "domain%d-pe%lx",
> >> + domain_number, pe_num));
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> void iommu_free_table(struct iommu_table *tbl, const char *node_name)
> >> {
> >> unsigned long bitmap_sz;
> >> unsigned int order;
> >>
> >> + if (tbl && tbl->it_group) {
> >> + iommu_group_put(tbl->it_group);
> >> + BUG_ON(tbl->it_group);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> if (!tbl || !tbl->it_map) {
> >> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: expected TCE map for %s\n", __func__,
> >> node_name);
> >> @@ -876,4 +906,317 @@ void kvm_iommu_unmap_pages(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> >> kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> >> {
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static enum dma_data_direction tce_direction(unsigned long tce)
> >> +{
> >> + if ((tce & TCE_PCI_READ) && (tce & TCE_PCI_WRITE))
> >> + return DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL;
> >> + else if (tce & TCE_PCI_READ)
> >> + return DMA_TO_DEVICE;
> >> + else if (tce & TCE_PCI_WRITE)
> >> + return DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
> >> + else
> >> + return DMA_NONE;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +void iommu_flush_tce(struct iommu_table *tbl)
> >> +{
> >> + /* Flush/invalidate TLB caches if necessary */
> >> + if (ppc_md.tce_flush)
> >> + ppc_md.tce_flush(tbl);
> >> +
> >> + /* Make sure updates are seen by hardware */
> >> + mb();
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_flush_tce);
> >> +
> >> +static long tce_clear_param_check(struct iommu_table *tbl,
> >> + unsigned long ioba, unsigned long tce_value,
> >> + unsigned long npages)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned long size = npages << IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT;
> >> +
> >> + /* ppc_md.tce_free() does not support any value but 0 */
> >> + if (tce_value)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if (ioba & ~IOMMU_PAGE_MASK)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if ((ioba + size) > ((tbl->it_offset + tbl->it_size)
> >> + << IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if (ioba < (tbl->it_offset << IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >
> > Why do these all return long (vs int)? Is this a POWER-ism?
>
> No, not really but yeah, I picked it in powerpc code :) I tried to keep
> them "long" but I noticed "int" below so what is the rule? Change all to int?
I'd say anything that's returning 0/-errno should probably be an int.
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static long tce_put_param_check(struct iommu_table *tbl,
> >> + unsigned long ioba, unsigned long tce)
> >> +{
> >> + if (!(tce & (TCE_PCI_WRITE | TCE_PCI_READ)))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if (tce & ~(IOMMU_PAGE_MASK | TCE_PCI_WRITE | TCE_PCI_READ))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if (ioba & ~IOMMU_PAGE_MASK)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if ((ioba + IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE) > ((tbl->it_offset + tbl->it_size)
> >> + << IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if (ioba < (tbl->it_offset << IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static long clear_tce(struct iommu_table *tbl,
> >> + unsigned long entry, unsigned long pages)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned long oldtce;
> >> + struct page *page;
> >> + struct iommu_pool *pool;
> >> +
> >> + for ( ; pages; --pages, ++entry) {
> >> + pool = get_pool(tbl, entry);
> >> + spin_lock(&(pool->lock));
> >> +
> >> + oldtce = ppc_md.tce_get(tbl, entry);
> >> + if (oldtce & (TCE_PCI_WRITE | TCE_PCI_READ)) {
> >> + ppc_md.tce_free(tbl, entry, 1);
> >> +
> >> + page = pfn_to_page(oldtce >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >> + WARN_ON(!page);
> >> + if (page) {
> >> + if (oldtce & TCE_PCI_WRITE)
> >> + SetPageDirty(page);
> >> + put_page(page);
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + spin_unlock(&(pool->lock));
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >
> > No non-zero return, make it void?
>
> ah, ok. The prototype will change for real mode either way, it will get a
> "realmode" flag and become able to fail (which will switch the virtual mode).
If you'll use it later on, no need to change it for me. Thanks,
Alex
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
