Le mardi 29 janvier 2013 18:59:12, Jason Gunthorpe a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 04:24:07PM +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > - dev->err_interrupt = irq_of_parse_and_map(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> > + if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> > + dev->regs = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> > + if (!dev->regs) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No SMI register address given in
DT\n");
> > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > + goto out_free;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev->err_interrupt = irq_of_parse_and_map(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> > + } else {
> > + r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > +
> > + dev->regs = ioremap(r->start, resource_size(r));
> > + if (!dev->regs) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No SMI register address given\n");
> > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > + goto out_free;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev->err_interrupt = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + }
>
> Why do you have these different paths for OF and platform? AFAIK these
> days when a OF device is automatically converted into a platform
> device all the struct resources are created too, so you can't you just
> use platform_get_resource and devm_request_and_ioremap for both flows?
>
> Ditto for the interrupt - platform_get_irq should work in both cases?
There was no particular reason and I updated the patchset to do that precisely
in version 2.
--
Florian
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
