Hi Srivatsa,

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:04:54 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> @@ -246,15 +291,21 @@ struct take_cpu_down_param {
>  static int __ref take_cpu_down(void *_param)
>  {
>       struct take_cpu_down_param *param = _param;
> -     int err;
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +     int err = 0;

It seems no need to set 'err' to 0.

Thanks,
Namhyung

> +
> +     percpu_write_lock_irqsave(&hotplug_pcpu_rwlock, &flags);
>  
>       /* Ensure this CPU doesn't handle any more interrupts. */
>       err = __cpu_disable();
>       if (err < 0)
> -             return err;
> +             goto out;
>  
>       cpu_notify(CPU_DYING | param->mod, param->hcpu);
> -     return 0;
> +
> +out:
> +     percpu_write_unlock_irqrestore(&hotplug_pcpu_rwlock, &flags);
> +     return err;
>  }
>  
>  /* Requires cpu_add_remove_lock to be held */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to