On Nov 28, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Chen Yuanquan-B41889 wrote:
>
>> On 11/25/2012 08:41 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Nov 22, 2012, at 10:29 PM, Yuanquan Chen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On powerpc arch, dma_ops of rescanned pci device after system's booting up
>>>> won't be
>>>> initialized by system, so it will fail to execute the dma_set_mask in the
>>>> device's
>>>> driver. Initialize it to solve this issue.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yuanquan Chen <b41...@freescale.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 7 +++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> This is not the right way to get the dma_ops setup. You need to find some
>>> other point for the hotplug scenario to get the dma_ops setup.
>>>
>>> - k
>>
>> Hi Kumar,
>>
>> I read the code about pci bus scan and rescan. Only the pcibios_fixup_bus in
>> pci_scan_child_bus and
>> pcibios_enable_device in pci_rescan_bus are arch related code. The
>> pcibios_fixup_bus won't be called
>> for the rescanned PCI devices due to the bus->is_added has been set for the
>> first scanning at boot time.
>> So I think it's more reasonable to do the same work as pcibios_fixup_bus for
>> rescanned PCI device in
>> pcibios_enable_device. The patch code is a copy of pcibios_setup_bus_devices
>> called by pcibios_fixup_bus,
>> It can solve the dma_set_mask and irq related issues of rescanned PCI device
>> on powerpc arch. What's
>> your opinion?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> yuanquan
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> index 7f94f76..30f7d61 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> @@ -1496,6 +1496,23 @@ int pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int
>> mask)
>> if (ppc_md.pcibios_enable_device_hook(dev))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> + if (!dev->is_added) {
>> + set_dev_node(&dev->dev, pcibus_to_node(dev->bus));
>> +
>> + /* Hook up default DMA ops */
>> + set_dma_ops(&dev->dev, pci_dma_ops);
>> + set_dma_offset(&dev->dev, PCI_DRAM_OFFSET);
>> +
>> + /* Additional platform DMA/iommu setup */
>> + if (ppc_md.pci_dma_dev_setup)
>> + ppc_md.pci_dma_dev_setup(dev);
>> +
>> + /* Read default IRQs and fixup if necessary */
>> + pci_read_irq_line(dev);
>> + if (ppc_md.pci_irq_fixup)
>> + ppc_md.pci_irq_fixup(dev);
>> + }
>> +
>> return pci_enable_resources(dev, mask);
>> }
>>
>
> This looks better than the first patch.. I'm surprised that the IBM guys
> don't run into a similar issue with their hotplug support.
>
> Maybe Ben or someone else will comment.
>
> - k
How about you post this as a clean patch, will be easier to get Ben to comment
on that.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
