On 11.10.2012, at 18:13, Mihai Caraman wrote:
> Add emulation helper for getting instruction ea and refactor tlb instruction
> emulation to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman <mihai.cara...@freescale.com>
> ---
> v1: use _t_ype instead of _t_arget _r_egister in tlbilx emulation.
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h | 6 +++---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_tlb.c | 33 +++++++++++----------------------
> 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> index 609cca3..a08e756 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -293,4 +293,15 @@ static inline void kvmppc_lazy_ee_enable(void)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static inline ulong kvmppc_get_ea_indexed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ra, int
> rb)
> +{
> + ulong ea;
> +
> + ea = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, rb);
> + if (ra)
> + ea += kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, ra);
> +
> + return ea;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __POWERPC_KVM_PPC_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
> index d162286..32e98a7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h
> @@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ int kvmppc_e500_emul_mt_mmucsr0(struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500
> *vcpu_e500,
> ulong value);
> int kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbwe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbre(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -int kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbivax(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ra, int rb);
> -int kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbilx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rt, int ra, int rb);
> -int kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbsx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rb);
> +int kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbivax(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t ea);
> +int kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbilx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int type, gva_t ea);
> +int kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbsx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t ea);
> int kvmppc_e500_tlb_init(struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500);
> void kvmppc_e500_tlb_uninit(struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500);
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c
> index e04b0ef..3bf2486 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op(struct kvm_run *run, struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> int emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
> int ra = get_ra(inst);
> int rb = get_rb(inst);
> - int rt = get_rt(inst);
The function scope rt variable shouldn't hurt, as the compiler will be smart
enough to only calculate it when it's actually used.
> + gva_t ea;
>
> switch (get_op(inst)) {
> case 31:
> @@ -113,15 +113,20 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op(struct kvm_run *run, struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> break;
>
> case XOP_TLBSX:
> - emulated = kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbsx(vcpu,rb);
> + ea = kvmppc_get_ea_indexed(vcpu, ra, rb);
> + emulated = kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbsx(vcpu, ea);
> break;
>
> - case XOP_TLBILX:
> - emulated = kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbilx(vcpu, rt, ra, rb);
> + case XOP_TLBILX: {
> + int t = (inst >> 21) & 0x3;
so we can remove this
> + ea = kvmppc_get_ea_indexed(vcpu, ra, rb);
> + emulated = kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbilx(vcpu, t, ea);
and instead here pass rt & 3.
The rest of the patch looks fine, so I'll do the change while applying it.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
