On 11/20/2012 05:37 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 02:58 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/20/2012 02:55 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/20/2012 02:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com>

Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
even if
we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.

So the patch add unregister_memory_section() into __remove_section().
Hi Yasuaki,

In order to review this patch, I should dig sparse memory codes in
advance. But I have some confuse of codes. Why need encode/decode mem
map instead of set mem_map to ms->section_mem_map directly?
The memmap is aligned, and the low bits are zero. We store some
information
in these bits. So we need to encode/decode memmap here.
Hi Congyang,

Thanks for you reponse. But I mean why return (unsigned long)(mem_map -
(section_nr_to_pfn(pnum))); in function sparse_encode_mem_map, and then
return ((struct page *)coded_mem_map) + section_nr_to_pfn(pnum); in
funtion sparse_decode_mem_map instead of just store mem_map in
ms->section_mep_map directly.
I don't know why. I try to find the reason, but I don't find any
place to use the pfn stored in the mem_map except in the decode
function. Maybe the designer doesn't want us to access the mem_map
directly.

It seems that mem_map is per node, but pfn is real pfn.
you can check __page_to_pfn.


Thanks
Wen Congyang

Regards,
Jaegeuk

Thanks
Wen Congyang

Regards,
Jaegeuk

CC: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <liu...@gmail.com>
CC: Len Brown <len.br...@intel.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan....@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wen Congyang <we...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
    mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 ++++++++-----
    1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index ca07433..66a79a7 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -286,11 +286,14 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int nid,
struct zone *zone,
    #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
    static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
*ms)
    {
-    /*
-     * XXX: Freeing memmap with vmemmap is not implement yet.
-     *      This should be removed later.
-     */
-    return -EBUSY;
+    int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+    if (!valid_section(ms))
+        return ret;
+
+    ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
+
+    return ret;
    }
    #else
    static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
*ms)


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to