On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:20:33AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > We have two #defines that rename scanhex() and skipbl() to > xmon_scanhex() and xmon_skipbl() - but no one ever uses those > names. > > So the only effect is to rename the actual symbols in the generated > code, and AFACIS there is no reason to do that, so drop them.
You might as well make scanhex() and skipbl() static while you're at it. Paul. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev