On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:20:33AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> We have two #defines that rename scanhex() and skipbl() to
> xmon_scanhex() and xmon_skipbl() - but no one ever uses those
> names.
> 
> So the only effect is to rename the actual symbols in the generated
> code, and AFACIS there is no reason to do that, so drop them.

You might as well make scanhex() and skipbl() static while you're at
it.

Paul.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to