My bad...
Will skip this patch in next patch-set...
On 14/09/12 14:06, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 03:18 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@st.com>
>>
>> As follow-up to "dt: introduce of_get_child_by_name to get child node by
>> name." patch, This patch removes some of the code duplication in the
>> driver by replacing it with of_get_child_by_name instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@st.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 5 +----
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> index f191bf0..80e5b6c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> @@ -735,7 +735,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
>> */
>> struct device_node *of_find_next_cache_node(struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *child;
>> const phandle *handle;
>>
>> handle = of_get_property(np, "l2-cache", NULL);
>> @@ -749,9 +748,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_next_cache_node(struct
>> device_node *np)
>> * beneath CPU nodes.
>> */
>> if (!strcmp(np->type, "cpu"))
>> - for_each_child_of_node(np, child)
>> - if (!strcmp(child->type, "cache"))
> name and type are not the same thing.
>
> Rob
>
>> - return child;
>> + return of_get_child_by_name(np, "cache");
>>
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
