On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 22:42 -0700, Haren Myneni wrote: > > Thanks Michael. Yes, we noticed 6% overhead with null syscall test. > Hence added cmdline option as suggested. I will add this comment in > the > changelog. > > Regarding the option name, I thought about various ones such as > retain_process_ppr, retain_smt_priority, save_ppr and etc. Finally > added > 'enable_ppr' since it enables CPU_FTR (CPU_FTR_HAS_PPR) which allows > to > save/restore PPR value. Sure, I will change this option.
No, that isn't a problem with the name. It's a problem with the polarity of the option. If you need a command line argument to enable the option, then nobody will enable it, it's pointless. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
