On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 12:58 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> There are a few tracepoints in the interrupt code path, which is before
> irq_enter(), or after irq_exit(), like
> trace_irq_entry()/trace_irq_exit() in do_IRQ(),
> trace_timer_interrupt_entry()/trace_timer_interrupt_exit() in
> timer_interrupt(). 
> 
> If the interrupt is from idle(), and because tracepoint contains RCU
> read-side critical section, we could see following suspicious RCU usage
> reported:

 .../...

> This is because the RCU usage in interrupt context should be used in
> area marked by rcu_irq_enter()/rcu_irq_exit(), called in
> irq_enter()/irq_exit() respectively. 
> 
> Could we add a new tracepoint trace_***_rcuirq, like trace_***_rcuidle
> to avoid the report? like the code attached below.
> 
> Or could we just move these tracepoints inside the
> irq_enter()/irq_exit() area? (Seems not good for the timer_interrupt
> case). 

I'd say just move them in. Anton, any objection ?

> Thanks, Zhong
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zh...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c  |    4 ++--
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c |    4 ++--
>  include/linux/tracepoint.h |   10 ++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> index 1f017bb..f0ac4e7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
>       struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
>       unsigned int irq;
>  
> -     trace_irq_entry(regs);
> +     trace_irq_entry_rcuirq(regs);
>  
>       irq_enter();
>  
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
>       irq_exit();
>       set_irq_regs(old_regs);
>  
> -     trace_irq_exit(regs);
> +     trace_irq_exit_rcuirq(regs);
>  }
>  
>  void __init init_IRQ(void)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> index e49e931..cbd6607 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * regs)
>        */
>       may_hard_irq_enable();
>  
> -     trace_timer_interrupt_entry(regs);
> +     trace_timer_interrupt_entry_rcuirq(regs);
>  
>       __get_cpu_var(irq_stat).timer_irqs++;
>  
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * regs)
>       irq_exit();
>       set_irq_regs(old_regs);
>  
> -     trace_timer_interrupt_exit(regs);
> +     trace_timer_interrupt_exit_rcuirq(regs);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> index 802de56..f7672d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -161,6 +161,16 @@ static inline void 
> tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void)
>                               rcu_idle_exit(),                        \
>                               rcu_idle_enter());                      \
>       }                                                               \
> +     static inline void trace_##name##_rcuirq(proto)                 \
> +     {                                                               \
> +             if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key))         \
> +                     __DO_TRACE(&__tracepoint_##name,                \
> +                             TP_PROTO(data_proto),                   \
> +                             TP_ARGS(data_args),                     \
> +                             TP_CONDITION(cond),                     \
> +                             rcu_irq_enter(),                        \
> +                             rcu_irq_exit());                        \
> +     }                                                               \
>       static inline int                                               \
>       register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data)    \
>       {                                                               \


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to