On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 15:46 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> On powerpc64 machine get/put_user64() is same as get/put_user() while
> on powerpc32 machine get_user64 is different. With this patch we can
> use get_user64() and put_user64() on 32 and 64 bit machines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhus...@freescale.com>
> ---
There appear to be no user of any of these APIs in the tree. There's
also no get_user64 -> __get_user64() macros either. Why not just remove
the whole lot ?
Cheers,
Ben.
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 17bb40c..01743aa 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -114,10 +114,17 @@ struct exception_table_entry {
> #define __put_user(x, ptr) \
> __put_user_nocheck((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
>
> +/*
> + * On powerpc64 machine get/put_user64() is same as get/put_user() while
> + * on powerpc32 machine get_user64 is different.
> + */
> #ifndef __powerpc64__
> #define __get_user64(x, ptr) \
> __get_user64_nocheck((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
> #define __put_user64(x, ptr) __put_user(x, ptr)
> +#else
> +#define __get_user64(x, ptr) __get_user(x, ptr)
> +#define __put_user64(x, ptr) __put_user(x, ptr)
> #endif
>
> #define __get_user_inatomic(x, ptr) \
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
